JUST IN: 30 MINUTES AGO — BREAKING on MS NOW: Jack Smith Unveils UNDENIABLE Evidence, and Trump’s Lawyers Are in a PANIC. Walking into a Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee, Jack Smith calmly shattered the “witch hunt” narrative and put everything on the record. In his opening statement, Smith declared: > “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power.” Smith told lawmakers that Trump broke the law, attempted to overturn the election, and would do so again if given the chance. Unapologetic and precise, he said he has zero regrets, would charge Trump again today based on the same facts, and added bluntly: if Trump didn’t want to be indicted, he shouldn’t have broken the law. He made clear the prosecution decision was his alone, grounded in Trump’s actions and backed by multiple grand juries in two districts, regardless of party. As the testimony unfolded, Republicans appeared to immediately regret calling him—while Trump’s legal team reportedly scrambled behind the scenes.

JUST IN: 30 MINUTES AGO — BREAKING on MS NOW: Jack Smith Unveils UNDENIABLE Evidence, and Trump’s Lawyers Are in a PANIC.

Walking into a Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee, Jack Smith calmly shattered the “witch hunt” narrative and put everything on the record.

In his opening statement, Smith declared:

> “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power.”

Smith told lawmakers that Trump broke the law, attempted to overturn the election, and would do so again if given the chance. Unapologetic and precise, he said he has zero regrets, would charge Trump again today based on the same facts, and added bluntly: if Trump didn’t want to be indicted, he shouldn’t have broken the law.

He made clear the prosecution decision was his alone, grounded in Trump’s actions and backed by multiple grand juries in two districts, regardless of party. As the testimony unfolded, Republicans appeared to immediately regret calling him—while Trump’s legal team reportedly scrambled behind the scenes.

Now comes a stunning twist: the BBC is reportedly seeking to call Jack Smith to testify in Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit. And although the full hearing wasn’t broadcast—an omission many are calling a travesty—what happened behind closed doors is exactly why Trump’s lawyers are panicking now.