BREAKING: Jack Smith Testifies for 8 Hours—No Fifth Amendment Invoked, GOP Chair Says

💥BREAKING: Jack Smith Testifies for 8 Hours—No Fifth Amendment Invoked, GOP Chair Says

Former special counsel Jack Smith spent eight hours behind closed doors Wednesday testifying to the House Judiciary Committee—and did not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights at any point, according to Chairman Jim Jordan.
“He did not take the Fifth like some of his deputies did,” the Ohio Republican said Thursday on Fox News.

Smith defended both federal investigations he led into Donald Trump, telling lawmakers he pursued charges without regard to party affiliation. His legal team has said Smith welcomed the chance to correct what he views as mischaracterizations of his work
Full story in comments 👇

Former special counsel Jack Smith spent roughly eight hours behind closed doors on Wednesday testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, a session that quickly drew political attention on Capitol Hill. According to Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, Smith did not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights at any point during the testimony, a detail the Ohio Republican highlighted in a television interview the following day. Jordan contrasted Smith’s appearance with that of some former deputies, whom he said previously declined to answer questions by pleading the Fifth.

During the closed-door session, Smith defended the federal investigations he led into former President Donald Trump, including cases related to election interference and the handling of classified documents. Lawmakers familiar with the testimony said Smith emphasized that his prosecutorial decisions were based on evidence and legal standards, not political considerations, and that party affiliation played no role in whether charges were pursued.

Smith’s legal team has stated that he welcomed the opportunity to testify, viewing it as a chance to address what he considers ongoing mischaracterizations of his work as special counsel. While details of the testimony remain limited due to its confidential nature, the appearance is likely to fuel continued debate in Congress over the scope and conduct of the Trump investigations, as well as broader questions about the independence of the Justice Department.